White House to release federal e-budget

Posted by Michael Sciannamea

January 12, 2008 | 1 Comment

federal-budget.jpgNext month, the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will release the federal budget for fiscal year 2009 as a downloadable and searchable file on its website and available to anyone who wants to read the (usually) massive document.

This is the first time that the OMB is choosing to release the budget electronically instead of in its usual paper format. According to the OMB, the decision will save about 20 tons of paper since it prints about 3,000 copies for distribution to White House staff, U.S. Senators and congressmen and their staffs, as well as the media. People who wish to have a hard copy, a four-volume set totaling over 2,200 pages–can still order them from the Government Printing Office, but the move is expected to save the U.S. around $1 million over the next five years.

Not a huge savings mind you, but definitely a step in the right direction. Hopefully, other state and local governments who haven’t already taken this measure will be influenced to do so, and soon.

Time to make your environmental concerns heard

Posted by Michael Sciannamea

December 28, 2007 | 4 Comments

environment4.jpgThe 2008 presidential race officially begins next week with the Iowa Caucuses and the New Hampshire Primaries, so it soon will be time for voters to choose candidates they feel best represent their views, including environmental policies.

With all of the “green” efforts going on throughout the country while gaining greater attention through both the mainstream and alternative media, 2008 could potentially be the year where environmental policy will (finally) become a major campaign issue. It goes beyond hybrid vehicles and global warming–it also involves alternative fuel sources and whether our economy can survive into the future with more money being spent on imported fuel.

As this and other editorials suggest, voters must begin putting pressure on their elected leaders to adopt environmental policies that have already been put into place throughout most of the world. This not only translates to the presidential race, but also for the congressional races as well as state and local elections. The environment is a national issue, but it affects all of us on an every day basis.

Illinois has potential to be wind farm “hotbed”

Posted by Michael Sciannamea

December 14, 2007 | Leave a Comment

windfarm1.jpgDespite high property tax rates and a varying bureaucratic process that could make getting the proper licenses difficult at best, it appears that the state of Illinois is poised to become one of the “hotbeds” of the wind farm/renewable energy effort.

Over 100 wind farm developers and local government officials gathered recently in Peoria to discuss issues including site development and taxation, and there was consensus that the state (and its forecasted wind currents) had the potential to be a desirable location for wind farms which, in turn, could evolve into an affordable energy alternative in the near future.

It goes without saying that wind farms are not mutually exclusive to the coastal areas of the United States, and we could see many more stories like this shortly, with states and local municipalities investigating wind farms and what types of economic and energy benefits they could have.

Albert Gore accepts the Nobel Peace Prize

Posted by Michael Sciannamea

December 10, 2007 | Leave a Comment

Albert Gore accepts the 2007 Nobel Peace PrizeFormer Vice President Albert Gore claimed his Nobel Peace Prize Monday and reiterated his call for governments and citizens to heed the call to take effective action to stop global warming and protect the environment.

The award ceremony was held in Oslo, Norway and Gore spoke forcefully on how the United States and China are not meeting their respective obligations to curb greenhouse gas emissions. Following are excerpts from his speech, courtesy of AlGore.com:

Seven years ago tomorrow, I read my own political obituary in a judgment that seemed to me harsh and mistaken – if not premature. But that unwelcome verdict also brought a precious if painful gift: an opportunity to search for fresh new ways to serve my purpose.

Unexpectedly, that quest has brought me here. Even though I fear my words cannot match this moment, I pray what I am feeling in my heart will be communicated clearly enough that those who hear me will say, “We must act.”

We, the human species, are confronting a planetary emergency – a threat to the survival of our civilization that is gathering ominous and destructive potential even as we gather here. But there is hopeful news as well: we have the ability to solve this crisis and avoid the worst – though not all – of its consequences, if we act boldly, decisively and quickly.

In the last few months, it has been harder and harder to misinterpret the signs that our world is spinning out of kilter. Major cities in North and South America, Asia and Australia are nearly out of water due to massive droughts and melting glaciers. Desperate farmers are losing their livelihoods. Peoples in the frozen Arctic and on low-lying Pacific islands are planning evacuations of places they have long called home. Unprecedented wildfires have forced a half million people from their homes in one country and caused a national emergency that almost brought down the government in another. Climate refugees have migrated into areas already inhabited by people with different cultures, religions, and traditions, increasing the potential for conflict. Stronger storms in the Pacific and Atlantic have threatened whole cities. Millions have been displaced by massive flooding in South Asia, Mexico, and 18 countries in Africa. As temperature extremes have increased, tens of thousands have lost their lives. We are recklessly burning and clearing our forests and driving more and more species into extinction. The very web of life on which we depend is being ripped and frayed.

We must quickly mobilize our civilization with the urgency and resolve that has previously been seen only when nations mobilized for war. These prior struggles for survival were won when leaders found words at the 11th hour that released a mighty surge of courage, hope and readiness to sacrifice for a protracted and mortal challenge.

These are the last few years of decision, but they can be the first years of a bright and hopeful future if we do what we must. No one should believe a solution will be found without effort, without cost, without change. Let us acknowledge that if we wish to redeem squandered time and speak again with moral authority, then these are the hard truths:

The way ahead is difficult. The outer boundary of what we currently believe is feasible is still far short of what we actually must do. Moreover, between here and there, across the unknown, falls the shadow.

That is just another way of saying that we have to expand the boundaries of what is possible. In the words of the Spanish poet, Antonio Machado, “Pathwalker, there is no path. You must make the path as you walk.”

For those who have been critical of Mr. Gore’s efforts, I ask you to inform us of what your efforts have been to bring forth positive change to the environmental concerns that lurk at our society’s door. When you can come up with a coherent answer, let us know. Until then, we should all applaud Mr. Gore for having the courage of his convictions and doing what he can to save our environment from ourselves.

U.S. Senate to vote on greenhouse gas emissions bill in 2008

Posted by Michael Sciannamea

December 7, 2007 | Leave a Comment

carbonemissions.jpgNext year the U.S. Senate will be voting on a bill designed to establish new greenhouse gas emission limits that will be adjusted every year after 2012. It is described as a “cap-and-trade program” that will allow utilities and industries to receive allowances if they stay under the gap, or have the ability to sell or trade them.

Supporters believe the measure will increase research and investment in alternative and cleaner fuel technologies, but detractors say this will lead companies to send jobs overseas where emissions standards in many countries are not nearly as stringent as this proposed bill would be.

The measure was passed in a Senate committee this week by a vote of 11-8–10 Democrats and one Republican (John Warner of Virginia) voted for it, while James Inhofe (R-Okla) and George Voinovich (R-Ohio) were two of the more notable opponents.

However, the bill has received support from California’s Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who believes that measures such as this will prompt greater business investment in his state, which has passed a number of emission control mandates.

With more attention being paid to “be green,” especially from networks like NBC who sponsored an entire “Green Week” earlier this fall, the environment could actually be a major presidential campaign issue in 2008. Time will tell…

Courtesy of ReutersOne of the more startling relevations coming from this week’s conference on climate change in Bali is that some Indonesian scientists believe that some of the 17,000 islands in the region could be completely swept up by the sea by the year 2035 if steps aren’t taken to reduce rising sea levels that are caused by climate change.

Although a situation that may take place 27 years down the road may not mean much to us, at least for the near future, another thought that was brought up by the same group of scientists was that the presidential palace in the Indonesian captial of Jakarta could be surrounded by water. What makes it so frightening is that the palace is situated six miles(!) from the sea.

The Bali confab is designed to discuss ways on developing a follow-up to the Kyoto Protocol, which was designed to reduce greenhouse gases that cause climate change. The protocol expires in 2012, and many believe that if factors such as greenhouse gases and carbon emissions continue to escalate, islands like those in Indonesia as well as in other regions could literally be swallowed by the rising sea levels.

It goes without saying that at the very least the takeaway from this conference is to begin establishing parameters for real guidelines to prevent these dire situations from happening. In addition, governments need to pay attention now, and not in 2030 when it could be too late.

Large wind farm project to be developed in Oregon

Posted by Michael Sciannamea

December 4, 2007 | Leave a Comment

windfarm.jpgA wind farm project that is expected to be the largest in the Pacific Northwest could generate enough electricity (909 megawatts) to power 225,000 homes.

The Shepherd’s Flat wind farm will be built along the Columbia River along Oregon’s Gilliam and Morrow counties and would include over 303 wind turbines, with some over 500 feet in height. The developer who will build the farm, Caithness Energy, which is based in New York,  has said that the project site will be housed on privately held land and plans are underway to construct a large infrastructure to support the turbines, including access roads, substations, and nearly 20 miles of high-voltage transmission lines.

Of course, a project like this will have its detractors, mostly the NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard)-types who believe these wind farms with their large turbines will constitute an eyesore for the area, and there are some who believe this alternative energy source will not provide power on a consistent basis because you cannot rely on the wind blowing all the time.

However, states such as Oregon, Washington, and California are mandating that utilities develop more sources of renewable energy within the next 20 years, and wind power is one of them. There are sure to be others coming down the pike, and the goal is to rely less on oil, especially from foreign providers.

Political change to drive climate change

Posted by Michael Sciannamea

December 3, 2007 | Leave a Comment

theearth.jpgSenator John F. Kerry (D-Massachusetts) has co-written a piece where he talks about how the only real way to move forward in the drive to recognize and react to climate change is to change the way the politics (and politicians) on this subject is viewed.

He cites an example of how Australia’s John Howard was the first national leader in the world to be voted out of office because of his inaction regarding the growning concerns of the Australian people about global warming. In fact, thew new Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, made it a point during the campaign that global warming will be a major priority in his administration.

Granted, Australia is not the United States, but they are not an impoverished third-world nation, either. In addition, many more citizens in countries around the world are making their voices heard to politicians and government leaders that an enforceable environmental policy should be an essential part of any legislative agenda.

However, it seems that the U.S. presidential candidates are mostly getting by with general statements about needing to “get something done” about the environment and mostly paying lip service to seeking out alternative fuel sources along with investigating the effects of global warming and climate change. During the last Republican debate hosted by CNN, with questions taken from YouTube submissions, not one question was asked or selected about the environment, but viewers were subjected to being beaten over the head about immigration and whether or not the candidates believed what was written in the Bible.

And let’s not just point the finger at Republicans–the Democrats aren’t exactly addressing the issues, either. John Edwards is the only one that has been somewhat vocal on his environmental platform, with John McCain being the standard-bearer for the Republican side.

Of course, we can’t always look to the Commander in Chief to get down to the nitty gritty regarding climate change and environmental policy. It really does have to come from a grassroots effort, not only by individual citizens and organizations, but state legislators are going to have to assume more of the responsibilities of affecting change. Sure, there are a number of companies who are looking to get more involved, but let’s remember that they are also are seeking positive press, as well as increasing their revenue stream, so we shouldn’t fall all over ourselves in gratitude, either.

Next year’s elections will be the biggest opportunity yet for voters to express their demand for a more enforceable environmental policy from their leaders. With more hybrid vehicles being seen on the road, and with the media paying more attention to climate change, the time is now to bring in leaders who will follow the lead of the people. Time will tell if we (and they) will step up to the plate.